Brown v. Strain’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.3d 245 · 2011
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Johnson v. Jones · Behrens v. Pelletier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appropriate standard to apply in analyzing constitutional challenges brought by pretrial detainees depends on whether the alleged unconstitutional conduct is a 'condition of confinement' or 'episodic act or omission.' " Tamez v. Manthey , 589 F.3d 764 , 769 (5th Cir. 2009) (quoting Scott v. Moore , 114 F.3d 51 , 53 (5th Cir. 1997) (en banc) ). The present challenge involves an "episodic act or omission”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Westfall v. Luna“where the complained-of harm is a particular act or omission of one or more officials”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Westfall v. Luna“); Mace v. City of Palestine , 333 F.3d 621 , 626 (5th Cir. 2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.