Holden v. Hirner’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.3d 336 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Johnson v. Jones · Beyerbach v. Sears · Coleman v. Rahija
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must proffer admissible evidence demonstrating a genuine dispute as to a material fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Prison officials lacking medical expertise are entitled to rely on the opinions of medical staff regarding inmate diagnosis and the decision of whether to refer the inmate to outside doctors or dentists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The level of culpability required to demonstrate deliberate indifference on the part of prison officials is equal to criminal recklessness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Leonard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.