United States v. Dolehide’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.3d 343 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Durham · United States v. Garcia · United States v. San-Miguel · United States v. Bastian · United States v. Griffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We now hold that § 2G2.2(b)(2)(B)’s five-level enhancement ... applies to a defendant who downloads and shares child pornography files via an internet peer-to-peer file-sharing network, [because] these networks exist — as the name”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.