Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 F.3d 367 - United States v. Augustine

United States v. Augustine’s Empirical Analysis

663 F.3d 367 · 2011

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gall v. United States · United States v. Irey · Wade v. Haynes · United States v. Boykin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On appeal of the grant or denial of a motion to suppress, we review the district court’s historical factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law on the probable cause issue de novo.” United States v. Wells, 223 F.3d 835 , 838 (8th Cir.2000). “Our role is to ensure that the evidence as a whole provides a substantial basis for finding probable cause to support the issuance of the search warrant.” United States v. Terry, 305 F.3d 818 , 822 (8th Cir.2002). “For probable cause to be shown, the warrant application and affidavit must describe circumstances showing that, based on practical experience and common sense, there is a fair probability that contraband or similar evidence will be found in the targeted place.” United States v. Nguyen, 526 F.3d 1129 , 1133 (8th Cir.2008). “When reviewing the sufficiency of an affidavit to support probable cause, we consider the ‘totality of the circumstances.’ ” United States v. Searcy, 181 F.3d 975 , 981 (8th Cir. 1999) (quoting United States v. Wright, 145 F.3d 972 , 975 (8th Cir.1998)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.