Qureshi v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.3d 778 · 2011
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co. · Ramming v. United States · Rodriguez-Castro v. Gonzales · American Airlines, Inc. v. Herman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Removal proceedings. When an alien's asylum status or withholding of removal or deportation is terminated under this section, the Service shall initiate removal proceedings, as appropriate, if the alien is not already in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. Removal proceedings may take place in conjunction with a termination hearing scheduled under § 208.24(f).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nijjar v. Holder · Bal v. Sessions“guided by the Supreme Court's interpretation of the APA's finality requirement as 'flexible' and 'pragmatic.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Termination of asylum Asylum granted under subsection (b) of this section does not convey a right to remain permanently in the United States, and may be terminated if the Attorney General determines that— (A) the alien no longer meets the conditions described in subsection (b)(1) of this section owing to a fundamental change in circumstances; (B) the alien meets a condition described in subsection (b)(2) of this section; (C) the alien may be removed, pursuant to a bilateral or multilateral agreement, to a country (other than the country of the alien's nationality or, in the case of an alien having no nationality, the country of the alien’s last habitual residence) in which the alien's life or freedom would not be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, and where the alien is eligible to receive asylum or equivalent temporary protection; (D) the alien has voluntarily availed himself or herself of the protection of the alien’s country of nationality or, in the case of an alien having no nationality, the alien's country of last habitual residence, by returning to such country with permanent resident status or the reasonable possibility of obtaining such status with the same rights and obligations pertaining to other permanent residents of that country; or (E) the alien has acquired a new nationality and enjoys the protection of the country of his or her new nationality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nijjar v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.