Sambrano v. Mabus’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.3d 879 · 2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Illinois Northern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Chandler v. Roudebush · Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A. · Ball v. City of Chicago · Mortell v. Mortell Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sanctions such as orders to pay the other side's attorneys' fees may redress injuries done to put-upon adversaries....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.