United States v. Sofjan Lamid’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Dusenbery v. United States · United States ex rel. Willard v. Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc. · City of Clinton v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. · United States v. Marion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because of the substantial danger of false claims in forfeiture proceedings, federal courts require strict compliance with”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Courts have routinely held that the deadline in section 853(n)(2) is mandatory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.