ITT Corp. v. Patrick P. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp. · NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CO · Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Authority · IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A fraud action is not incidental to another claim 'only when: (1) the fraud occurred separately from and subsequent to the injury forming the basis of the alternate claim; and (2) the injuries caused by the fraud are distinct from the injuries caused by the alternate claim.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trisvan v. Heyman“In New York, the limitations period for a fraud claim is 'the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued or two years from the time the plaintiff ... discovered the fraud, or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trisvan v. Heyman“[w]hen a fraud claim is incidental to another asserted claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trisvan v. Heyman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.