Coleman v. Block’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2007
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 556 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 1981A · 7 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Udall v. Tallman · Goss v. Lopez · Linkletter v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statement, prominently displayed, that complete explanations of the various [loan servicing] options listed on the form, and the implications or effects of choosing or rejecting them, are available at the local county FmHA office. FmHA must formulate and distribute to all of its county offices uniform and comprehensive, but also clear and readable, explanations of each of the options listed on FmHA 1924-26, including, but not necessarily limited to, the eligibility requirements, terms, restrictions, and benefits of each option, and the effect that choosing one option would have in foreclosing the availability of other options.... [Also,] Defendants must redraft FmHA 1924-26 to allow borrowers to make a separate election of options for each loan accelerated and for each reason given for each proposed action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to amend form FmHA 1924-26 to allow borrowers a separate election of options for each loan accelerated and for each reason given for each proposed action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coleman v. Lyng“Notice--Farmer Program Borrower Servicing Options Including Deferrals and Borrower Responsibilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coleman v. Lyng
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.