Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

663 N.E.2d 1157

Gonzalez v. Clinton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1996

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HOFFMAN, Judge,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur solely on the basis that the trial judge, from the evidence presented, found that the plaintiff's claim fell within the Worker's Compensation Act. The facts most favorable to the ruling are: that Alexsandra Gonzalez was an employee of Inland Steel; that she attended a meeting at work which she was required to attend just prior to picking up her husband who was also employed by Inland Steel; that an accident happened on Inland Steel's property as they were leaving the premises; and that the driver of the vehicle which struck the Gonzalez' car was also employed by Inland Steel.

/663/ne2d/1157 · .json · Public domain