Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 SO2D 1024 - Speigner v. State

Speigner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2015

7 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Keiswetter · 542 So. 2d 931 - Ex Parte Heaton · United States v. Keiswetter · 615 So. 2d 640 - Alderman v. State · 516 So. 2d 937 - Hines v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The only factual basis required for a guilty plea is that which will satisfy the court that the appellant knows what he is pleading guilty to.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`The factual basis [can be] established, in part, by the appellant's admission that he knew to what offense he was pleading guilty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.