ERI, INC. v. Weinstein’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 612 So. 2d 247 - Succession of Schulz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the present case, we deem the motion for new trial to have been taken under advisement, therefore La.C.C.P. art. 1914 applies. The delays for filing the motion for an appeal did not begin to run until notice of the judgment was mailed on March 20, 1995. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.