Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

663 So. 2d 11

Sullo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-11-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2000

4 state decisions

Relies on 660 So. 2d 376 - Fountain v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks review of an order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. Following Fountain v. State, 660 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. If the record can answer the question of whether appellant is entitled to jail time credit, the rule 3.800(a) motion is appropriate for seeking relief. If that fact cannot be determined from the record, the rule 3.800(a) motion should be denied.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/663/so2d/11 · .json · Public domain