Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 SO2D 173 - Ballex v. Naccari

Ballex v. Naccari’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 397 So. 2d 475 - Bazley v. Tortorich · 550 So. 2d 577 - Penalber v. Blount · 397 So. 2d 490 - Vermilion Corp. v. Vaughn · White v. Monsanto Co. · 454 So. 2d 1081 - Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the acts [of alleged harassment], some of which are alleged to have occurred away from the office at lunch, arose out of business or personal activities is a question to be determined by the trier of fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a motion for summary judgment is not suitable for the disposition of cases requiring judicial determination of subjective facts such as intent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sexual harassment requires a factual determination as to intent because the perpetrator may have thought his sexual advances were wanted ones”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.