State v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 398 So. 2d 1049 - State v. Jones · 639 So. 2d 237 - State v. Smith · 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought appellate review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.