663 So. 2d 250 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kirby v. Illinois · McNeil v. Wisconsin · 404 So. 2d 929 - State v. Bickham · State v. Hattaway · 635 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Van Winkle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of jurisprudential authority holds that an accused is not entitled to be represented by counsel at a pre-indictment lineup. In Stewart v. State of Louisiana, 95-2385 (La.7/2/96), 676 So.2d 87 , the Supreme Court found that a pre-indictment physical lineup was not a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.