Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 SO2D 266 - Berry v. Berry

Berry v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 511 So. 2d 53 - Dauphine v. Dauphine · 640 So. 2d 810 - Towell v. Towell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “La.R.S. 9:311(A) states as follows: “An award for support shall not be reduced or increased unless the party seeking the reduction or increase shows a change in circumstances of one of the parties between the time of the previous award and the time of the motion for modification of the award.” In Towell v. Towell, 93-1610, at 4 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/1/94); 640 So.2d 810 , 813 a panel of this court stated the following: A reviewing court must give great deference to a trial court’s determination of whether the spouse has shown a change in circumstances sufficient to modify or terminate an alimony award. Dauphine v. Dauphine, 511 So.2d 53 (La.App. 3 Cir.1987). Such an award will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion. Dau-phine, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.