Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

663 So. 2d 678

Dobrowolski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-11-29

Relies on Allen v. State

Decided 1995-11-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction. We also affirm appellant’s sentence, except we reverse that part of the probation order that required appellant to “submit to urinalysis, breathalyzer or blood tests at any time requested by [her] Officer.” Although the trial court did pronounce in open court the requirement to submit to urinalysis, it did not include pronouncement of breathalyzer or *679blood tests. See Allen v. State, 640 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We remand to the trial court with instructions to conform the written probation order to its oral pronouncement of sentence.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/663/so2d/678 · .json · Public domain