United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
664 F.2d 94 · 1981
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez (2008), State v. Graham (1986)
53 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Texas v. Louisiana · Lombard v. Marcera · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Trammel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the prosecutor may not use such a statement under the guise of impeachment for the primary purpose of placing before the jury substantive evidence which is not otherwise admissible.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Puffing, boasts, and other conversation ... are admissible when used by the declarant to obtain the confidence of one involved in the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Israel“lest we defeat the purpose of the exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.