Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 F.3d 1225 - Bair v. Callahan

Bair v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis

664 F.3d 1225 · 2012

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Beelman River Terminals, Inc. · Cummings v. Malone · Foster v. Time Warner Entertainment Co. · Kostel v. Schwartz · Zoltek Corp. v. Structural Polymer Group

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not the kind of 'knowledge Rule 404(b) contemplates,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “had the knowledge to perform the surgery”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.