Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 F.3d 123 - Brown v. Calamos

Brown v. Calamos’s Empirical Analysis

664 F.3d 123 · 2011

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
October 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80A

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit · United States v. O'Hagan · Rockwell International Corp. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the allegations of the complaint make it likely that an issue of fraud will arise in the course of the litigation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f such a suit is brought in a state court the defendant can remove it to federal court and move to dismiss it ... [and] the district judge must grant the motion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.