Rui Yang v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
664 F.3d 580 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Abdulai v. Ashcroft · Yu Zhao v. Gonzales · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Shabanali Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it does govern our standard of review with respect to the IJ’s determination regarding corroborative evidence.” Rui Yang v. Holder, 664 F.3d 580 , 587 n. 7 (5th Cir.2011) (noting the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Omondi v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.