Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 FSUPP 931 - Beehler v. Jeffes

Beehler v. Jeffes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
November 1996
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 2301 (Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act)

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Bell v. Hood · Montana v. United States · Cannon v. University of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The scope of a consent decree must be discerned within its four (4) corners. The goal of the task of interpreting a contract is to ascertain the intent of the parties as manifested by the language of the written instrument. Consequently, a court may examine the circumstances surrounding the consent decree, including the context in which the parties were operating, without departure from the so-called four (4) corners rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled that a federal court has the inherent power to enforce and to consider challenges to settlements entered into in cases originally filed therein. Typically, the court does this without inquiring into, or requiring, an independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction for the enforcement/challenge suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.