664 F. Supp. 2d 472 - Datto v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 705 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Tennessee v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.