Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 NE2D 379 - Wilcox v. State

Wilcox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2010

16 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. · Sims v. State · Pettit v. Pettit · Tofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc. · Duvall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Collateral estoppel operates to bar a subsequent relitigation of the same fact or issue where that fact or issue was necessarily adjudicated in a former suit and the same fact or issue is presented in the subsequent lawsuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.