People v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Agurs · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Harris v. New York · Holloway v. Arkansas · Michel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Tjhere is material evidence, not relating to reputation, which is admissible against one [co-defendant] but which is not admissible against [the other] .... [and] which is prejudicial to [the defendant as to whom it is not admissible] _” People v. Armstrong, 664 P.2d 716 (Colo.App.1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Vigil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.