Command Credit Corp. v. Mineo’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 555 So. 2d 828 - Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom · Kaufman v. MacDonald · 564 So. 2d 1078 - Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Is a contingency risk multiplier inapplicable to a court awarded attorney's fee where the only authority for fees is predicated on a contractual provision and not a statute?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a contingency multiplier is not applicable where the only authority for a fee award is based on a contractual provision and not a statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“never has been contemplated that a court should utilize a contingent-fee multiplier to calculate a reasonable attorney's fee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.