Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 So. 2d 3 - Scott v. State

664 So. 2d 3 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Hialeah, Inc. v. Bell · 610 So. 2d 1283 - Coleman v. State · 395 So. 2d 1175 - Pressley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The presentation of new evidence after the court submits the cause to the jury is improper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he display . . . constitute[d] non-testimonial `real or physical' evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to display his face from different angles to the jurors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.