Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 664 S.W.2d 563 - Bates v. State

Bates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2011

6 state decisions

401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 11 Cal. 3d 469 - Hayes v. State of California · Jones v. State Highway Commission · Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis County · State Ex Rel. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Hon. Carl R. Gaertner · Twente v. Ellis Fischel State Cancer Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Injuries caused by the condition of a public entity’s property if the plaintiff establishes that the property was in dangerous condition at the time of the injury, that the injury directly resulted from the dangerous condition, that the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm of the kind of injury which was incurred, and that either a negligent or wrongful act or omission of an employee of the public entity within the course of his employment created the dangerous condition or a public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition in sufficient time prior to the injury to have taken measures to protect against the dangerous condition....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.