Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 F.2d 1060 - Love v. Budai

Love v. Budai’s Empirical Analysis

665 F.2d 1060 · 1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 1993
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 292

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · District of Columbia v. Carter · Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society · Melvin Carter v. John R. Carlson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To dismiss a claim on jurisdictional amount grounds, the court must find to a legal certainty that plaintiff could not recover in excess of $10,000.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.