Smith v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.2d 172 · 1981
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Doe 1-13 Doe 1-13 1-13 v. Chiles & a (1998), Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources (1982)
14 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Rosado v. Wyman · Graham v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) and IDPA reached an agreement at the time Englewood moved for a temporary restraining order at the commencement of this action, these Findings and Conclusions do not apply to grant relief to Englewood (although pre-agreement facts relating to Englewood are included as relevant to the issues dealt with in this order). 3 . In total the Act’s provisions constitute Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396 to 1396p. Citations to the Act will simply take the form”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“As the Department points to no explicit provision within the Act and no ground in the Constitution which restricts the district court's authority to award equitable relief, the district court had authority to exercise its full powers of equity to effectuate the purposes of the Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Alexander v. Hill“[o]n occasion the courts must act to make certain that what can be done is done. Agency inaction can be as harmful as wrong action. The [state] cannot, by its delay, substantially nullify rights which the Act confers, though it preserves them in form.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.