Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 F.2d 586 - Jones v. Fitch

Jones v. Fitch’s Empirical Analysis

665 F.2d 586 · 1982

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2007 · most notably Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (1994), Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Metzger (1982)

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

170198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Anderson Bros. Ford v. Valencia · International Harvester Credit Corporation and International Harvester Company v. East Coast Truck and R. v. Sales, Inc., East Coast Truck and R. v. Sales, Inc. v. International Harvester Company · In re Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the total mix of information made available.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “substantial novel questions of state law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “need not be so important that a reasonable consumer would probably change creditors. However, the information must be of some significance to a reasonable consumer under the circumstances in his 'comparison shopping' for credit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.