United States v. Bagnariol’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.2d 877 · 1981
Citation profile
228 federal appellate · 15 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 339 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Boylan (1990), Walgren v. United States (1982)
228 federal appellate · 15 district · 28 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Turkette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 339 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'uniquely qualified to appraise the probable effect of information on the jury, the materiality of the extraneous material, and its prejudicial nature.'”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he trial court, upon learning of a possible incident of juror misconduct, must hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the precise nature of the extraneous information,”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“may not be questioned about the deliberative process ... nor can such information be considered by the trial or appellate courts.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.