Milens of California v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.2d 906 · 1982
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2009
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Kaiser Aetna v. United States · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · 12 Cal. 3d 447 - City of San Jose v. Superior Court · United States v. Lucinda Grizzard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We look to local state law to determine what property rights exist....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.