Bartholomew v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.2d 915 · 1982
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably Sanchez v. Miller (1986), Redding v. Fairman (1983)
27 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Hicks v. Miranda · Jiro J. Enomoto, Etc. v. James C. Wright · Ohio Ex Rel. Eaton v. Price · Bourns, Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the decision to preclude the calling of a witness should be made on a case-by-case analysis of the potential hazards which may flow from the calling of a particular person.... A blanket proscription against the calling of certain types of "witnesses in all cases involving institutional security is an overreaction which violates minimal due process.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Forbes v. Trigg · Shabazz v. Dupnik“Minimal procedural due process requirements must be met in prison disciplinary proceedings, including the opportunity to call witnesses and present documentary evidence in defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a transfer to segregation[,] whether labelled administrative or disciplinary, is so similar that [prisoners] are entitled to the same due process in either case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGinty v. Rue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.