Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 F.2d 934 - Davis v. Schweiker

Davis v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

665 F.2d 934 · 1982

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Plummer v. Apfel (1999), Gonzalez v. Sullivan (1990)

20 federal appellate ·

25019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Grose v. Cohen · Matos v. Secretary of Health · Guadalupe Organization, Incorporated v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 · Hensley v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he Secretary's decision not to re-open a previously adjudicated claim for social security benefits' is a purely discretionary one and is therefore not considered a 'final' decision within the meaning of Sec. 405(g).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “allow a claimant judicial review simply by filing--and being denied--a petition to reopen his claim would frustrate the congressional purpose ... to impose a 60 day limitation upon judicial review of the Secretary's final decision on the initial claim for benefits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Within four years of the date of the notice of the initial determination if we find good cause ... to reopen the case....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.