Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 F.2d 936 - Thompson v. Schweiker

Thompson v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

665 F.2d 936 · 1982

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2016 · most notably Heckler v. Campbell (1983), Gallant v. Heckler (1984)

40 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

7001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant · Hall v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Cox v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the record is patently inadequate to support the findings the ALJ made, application of res judicata is tantamount to a denial of due process.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to scrupulously and conscientiously probe into, inquire of, and explore for all the relevant facts,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.