Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 F.2d 998 - Robb v. Universal Constructors, Inc.

Robb v. Universal Constructors, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

665 F.2d 998 · 1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank in Fort Collins v. Rostek · Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co. · United Telecommunications, Inc. v. American Television & Communications Corp. · Davis Cattle Co. v. Great Western Sugar Co. · Curtis v. Schwartzman Packing Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Damages for loss of use are not recoverable unless, in fact, it was reasonably necessary for the plaintiff to rent other property and he did, in fact, rent other property. No recovery can be made above the rental actually paid out or incurred. If the property is totally destroyed, then damages for loss of use are not recoverable. Citing [Curtis, 61 N.M. 305, 306 , 299 P.2d 776 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.