Johnson v. Finn’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.3d 1063 · 2011
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Mathews v. Eldridge · Batson v. Kentucky · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Ornelas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will be the result of first-hand observations of witnesses and evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oshodi v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.