Weitz Co. v. MacKenzie House, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
665 F.3d 970 · 2012
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway District No. 13 · Browning v. President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc. · Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp. · King v. Ahrens · Unit Drilling Company v. Enron Oil & Gas Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This court reviews decisions on default judgments for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.