Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 P2D 1288 - Lord v. Shaw

Lord v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
10
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2023

17 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marchetti v. United States · Grosso v. United States · United States v. United States Coin & Currency · United States v. One 1961 Red Chevrolet Impala Sedan, Serial No. 11837A177369 · Myers v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[D]ivorce actions will become unduly complicated in their trial and disposition if torts can be or must be litigated in the same action. A divorce action is highly equitable in nature, whereas the trial of a tort claim is at law and may well involve, as in this case, a request for trial by jury. The administration of justice will be better served by keeping the two proceedings separate." (emphasis added)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Specific averments in pleading{s] are usually given precedence over general ones regarding the same matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The specific averments are deemed to supplant, limit and control the general allegations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.