665 So. 2d 1237 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 945 So. 2d 277 - State v. Shumaker (2006), 827 So. 2d 488 - State v. Murray (2002)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 879 (§ 509 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Illinois v. Gates · Ker v. State of California · Hudson v. Louisiana · Kliewer v. New Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defendant must have been represented by counsel at the earlier hearing; (2) the witness testified under oath; (3) the witness was cross-examined or else there was a valid waiver of the right to cross-examination; (4) at the time of the trial, the witness (whether out of state or not) is unavailable to testify; and (5) the state had made a good faith diligent effort to obtain the presence of the witness, including by its out-of-state subpoena powers where appropriate. Robinson, supra ; State v. Hills, 379 So.2d 740 (La.1980).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fuller · State v. Robinson“... that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“behavior can provide the basis for probable cause: The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.