Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 So. 2d 205 - Ex Parte Blount

665 So. 2d 205 - Ex Parte Blount’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2014

8 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. General Motors Corp. · 480 So. 2d 1201 - Ex Parte Tidwell Industries, Inc. · 569 So. 2d 725 - Ex Parte W.S. Newell, Inc. · Graham v. Bob Mandal Nissan, Inc. · 630 So. 2d 435 - Ex Parte Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It was not Blount's burden to prove that the defendants did business in *Page 83 Baldwin County, until the defendants first established as a basis for the transfer that they did not do business there. Because the defendants failed to carry their burden of proof, the burden never shifted to Blount."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[1][A] domestic corporation may be sued in any county in which it does business by agent or was doing business by agent at the time the cause of action arose; provided, [2] that all actions against a domestic corporation for personal injuries must be commenced in the county where the injury occurred or [3] in the county where the plaintiff resides if such corporation does business by agent in the county of the plaintiffs residence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “all actions against a domestic corporation for personal injuries must be commenced in the county where the injury occurred or in the county where the plaintiff resides if such corporation does business by agent in the county of the plaintiff's residence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.