Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 So. 2d 629 - State v. Thomas

665 So. 2d 629 - State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2018

11 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 410 So. 2d 720 - State v. Belgard · State v. Brown · 389 So. 2d 1328 - State v. Williamson · State v. Thomas · 505 So. 2d 44 - State v. Arvie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Louisiana has not adopted a general plain error rule. Those circumstances where review has been granted in the absence of a contemporaneous objection were fact-specific situations where the relevant errors substantially affected the fairness of the proceeding and the reliability of the fact-finding process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “C. A party may not assign as error the giving or failure to give a jury charge or any portion thereof unless an objection thereto is made before the jury retires or within such time as the court may reasonably cure the alleged error. The nature of the objection and grounds therefore shall be stated at the time of the objection. The court shall give the party an opportunity to make the objection out of the presence of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “review of criminal trial errors on appeal has long been governed by the contemporaneous objection rule found in La. C. Cr. P. art. 841.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.