Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 665 So. 2d 760 - Scott v. Scott

665 So. 2d 760 - Scott v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2014

10 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · Thompson v. Thompson · 433 So. 2d 705 - Everett v. Everett · 644 So. 2d 789 - Connelly v. Connelly · 605 So. 2d 1162 - Timmons v. Timmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. The court may order an evaluation of a party or the child in a custody or visitation proceeding for good cause shown. The evaluation shall be made by a mental health professional selected by the parties or by the court. The court may render judgment for costs of the evaluation, or any part thereof, against any party or parties, as it may consider equitable. B. The court may order a party or the child to submit to and cooperate in the evaluation, testing, or interview by the mental health professional. The mental health professional shall provide the court and the parties with a written report. The mental health professional shall serve as the witness of the court, subject to cross-examination by a party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In assessing whether a parent’s sexual lifestyle is cause for removing or denying custody, we must consider whether the behavior was damaging to the children. This involves a determination of (1) whether the children were aware of the illicit relationship, (2) whether sex play occurred in their presence, (3) whether the furtive conduct was notorious and brought embarrassment to the children, and (4) what effect the conduct had on the family home life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.