State v. MacE’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2006
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Strickland · State v. Selle · State v. Eaton · State v. Taylor · State v. Abram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"the act of impairing or the state of being impaired." "Impairing" and "impaired", in turn, are defined ... as "to make worse; diminish in quantity, value, excellence or strength; damage, lessen." The word "function" is defined ... as "the action to which a person or thing is specifically fitted, used or responsible or for which a thing exists."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the action to which a person or thing is specifically fitted, used or responsible or for which a thing exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Interest of NAG“the act of impairing or the state of being impaired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Interest of NAG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.