State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1991
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brown v. Illinois · Dunaway v. New York · State v. Giffin · State v. Olds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings on the issue of guilt or innocence, we accept as true all evidence tending to prove appellant’s guilt, together with inferences favorable to the State that can be reasonably drawn therefrom, and we disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130 [2] (Mo.1982). If there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings, its judgment is to be affirmed. Id. 130 [1].” State v. Brown, 665 S.W.2d 945, 948 (Mo.App.1984). “Conflicts in the evidence, the determination of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony are within the province of the trier of fact.” State v. Hitchcock, 676 S.W.2d 538, 540 (Mo.App.1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.