Gallimore v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2014
3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal · Riggs v. . Palmer · Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Harrington v. Emmerman · Price v. Hitaffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a statutory enactment authorizes a particular result only in situations A, B, and C, a court which is not satisfied with this arrangement can order the same result in situation D by “creative expansion” of the common law or by some similar doctrine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The Restatement may be regarded both as the product of expert opinion and as the expression of the law by the legal profession.” Id. Although we are not required to follow the Restatement, we should generally do so”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.