Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 F.2d 1 - Angola v. Civiletti

Angola v. Civiletti’s Empirical Analysis

666 F.2d 1 · 1981

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Rakovich v. Wade (1988), Gibson v. United States (1986)

19 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Bates v. City of Little Rock · De Jonge v. Oregon · United States v. Berrios

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our Court recognized that certain claims are so easily made and can precipitate such protracted proceeding with such disruption of governmental functions that, despite the general rule of Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), detailed fact pleading is required to withstand a motion to dismiss. A claim of a conspiracy to violate civil rights is a clear example.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are so easily made and can precipitate such protracted proceedings with such disruption of governmental functions that, despite the general rule of Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), detailed fact pleading is required to withstand a motion to dismiss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.