Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 F.2d 10 - United States v. Rush

United States v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis

666 F.2d 10 · 1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2006

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

130198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Barrett v. United States · Romano v. United States · United States v. Falcone · Direct Sales Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at an exorbitant and usurious profit ... through a clandestine method”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.